Outline(week3 objective)

1. The introduction

I will first tell that many people know that animal tests are being held for humans. Next, I will say that animal test can be both good or bad.  Then I will shift attention to whether the audience know it is bad for both humans and animals. I'll end up with the thesis of my argument " Animal test should be regulated."

2. The narration 

I will summarize the research I've done and provide an explanation to the audience about the present condition of animal tests. I will also explain the definition of a 'animal test'. Moreover, I will state where the animal tests are used in.

3. The confirmation

     I will begin with some bad effects of animal tests and how it is related with human as well. 

       Then I'll give the examples of why we should regulate animal tests. Of course, I will reinforce my           argument by stating authority's statements.

4. The refutation and concession

I will concede that animal tests can be beneficial for human life. But still, there are some side effects, and also animals can suffer. Thus I will refute some arguments of people who say that animal tests should continue

5. The summation

I will finish my essay by restating my previous points. Also, I will say that most countries has regulated animal tests recently. 

---------------------------------------------
Notes for outline

Animal tests should be regulated.

R1 : Animal test is against ethics.

    -pain to animals

    -killing the same precious life as humans is not right

R2 :Humans should not test animals for their profits.

    -Animal testing because it is cheap is not right.

    -There are some alternative resources.

R3 : Animal tests are not safe.

    -only 1.16% same disease with human

    -different reaction on tests with human

Refutation

1.Many countries and organizations define the 3R(replacement, reduction, refinement) for the animal tests.

 Ref1: Not every nation is follwing the 3R rule
 Ref2: Still, the animals die after experiment.

2. Animals tests can be used effectively on human life.

Ref1: If animal test can help reducing disease on humans, it is okay. However, Animals tested for cosmetics should stop. one hundred million animals should not die each year for human's beauty and health.
Ref2 : It may cause serious side effect. Cannot ignore the 1.16%? Most of the diseases included in 1.16% already has cure.

Conclusion
 Europe union has already regulated animal test on primates.(monkeys,chimps)
 Human being is also an animal